CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
All City Council Meetings are live streamed on the city's website (https://www.flagstaff.az.gov/1461/Streaming-City-Council-Meetings) ***PUBLIC COMMENT*** Verbal public comments may be given through a virtual public comment platform or in-person If you want to provide a verbal comment during the Council Meeting, use the link below to join the virtual public comment room. VIRTUAL PUBLIC COMMENT WAITING ROOM Written comments may be submitted to publiccomment@flagstaffaz.gov. All comments submitted via email will be considered written comments and will be documented into the record as such. |
1. | CALL TO ORDER
NOTICE OF OPTION TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION
Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the City Council and to the general public that, at this regular meeting, the City Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for legal advice and discussion with the City’s attorneys for legal advice on any item listed on the following agenda, pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(3). |
||||||||
2. | ROLL CALL
|
||||||||
3. | PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, MISSION STATEMENT, AND LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
MISSION STATEMENT
The mission of the City of Flagstaff is to protect and enhance the quality of life for all.
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The Flagstaff City Council humbly acknowledges the ancestral homelands of this area’s Indigenous nations and original stewards. These lands, still inhabited by Native descendants, border mountains sacred to Indigenous peoples. We honor them, their legacies, their traditions, and their continued contributions. We celebrate their past, present, and future generations who will forever know this place as home.
|
||||||||
4. | APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS | ||||||||
A. | Consideration and Approval of Minutes: City Council Regular Meeting of September 21, 2021, Special Work Session/Town Hall of September 24, 2021, Combined Special Meeting/Work Session of September 28, 2021, Regular Meeting of October 5, 2021, Special Meeting (Executive Session) of September 13, 2022, Special Meeting (Executive Session) of September 20, 2022, and Special Meeting (Executive Session) of September 27, 2022. | ||||||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||||||
Approve the minutes of the City Council Regular Meeting of September 21, 2021, Special Work Session/Town Hall of September 24, 2021, Combined Special Meeting/Work Session of September 28, 2021, Regular Meeting of October 5, 2021, Special Meeting (Executive Session) of September 13, 2022, Special Meeting (Executive Session) of September 20, 2022, and Special Meeting (Executive Session) of September 27, 2022.
|
|||||||||
5. | PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Public Participation enables the public to address the Council about an item that is not on the agenda. Comments relating to items that are on the agenda will be taken at the time that the item is discussed. If you wish to address the Council at tonight's meeting, please complete a comment card and submit it to the recording clerk as soon as possible. Your name will be called when it is your turn to speak. You may address the Council up to three times throughout the meeting, including comments made during Public Participation. Please limit your remarks to three minutes per item to allow everyone an opportunity to speak. At the discretion of the Chair, ten or more persons present at the meeting and wishing to speak may appoint a representative who may have no more than fifteen minutes to speak. |
||||||||
6. | PROCLAMATIONS AND RECOGNITIONS |
||||||||
A. | Proclamation: Nation's Finest 50th Anniversary | ||||||||
B. | Proclamation: Alzheimer's and Caregiver Month | ||||||||
C. | Proclamation: Native American Heritage Month | ||||||||
7. | COUNCIL LIAISON REPORTS | ||||||||
8. | APPOINTMENTS Pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.02, notice is hereby given to the members of the City Council and to the general public that the City Council may vote to go into executive session, which will not be open to the public, for the purpose of discussing or considering employment, assignment, appointment, promotion, demotion, dismissal, salaries, disciplining or resignation of a public officer, appointee, or employee of any public body...., pursuant to A.R.S. §38-431.03(A)(1). |
||||||||
A. | Consideration of Appointments: Transportation Commission. | ||||||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||||||
Make one appointment to a term expiring July 2023.
Make one appointments to a term expiring July 2025. Make one appointment to a term for an FUSD Representative seat expiring November 2025. Make one appointment to a term for a NAIPTA Representative seat expiring November 2025. |
|||||||||
B. | Consideration of Appointments: Commission on Diversity Awareness. | ||||||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||||||
Make one appointment to a term expiring September 2023.
Make three appointments to terms expiring September 2025. |
|||||||||
9. | LIQUOR LICENSE PUBLIC HEARINGS | ||||||||
A. | Consideration and Action on Liquor License Application: Andrea Dahlman Lekowitz "GoPuff," 2001 E. Huntington Drive, Suite 1, Series 10 (beer and wine store), New License. | ||||||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||||||
Hold the public hearing.
The City Council has the option to: (1) Forward the application to the State with a recommendation for approval; (2) Forward the application to the State with no recommendation; (3) Forward the application to the State with a recommendation for denial based on information from staff, the testimony received at the public hearing and/or other factors. |
|||||||||
10. | CONSENT ITEMS
All matters under Consent Agenda are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion approving the recommendations listed on the agenda. Unless otherwise indicated, expenditures approved by Council are budgeted items. |
||||||||
A. | Consideration and Approval of Letter of Intent: City of Peace | ||||||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||||||
Approve the letter of intent.
|
|||||||||
B. | Consideration and Approval of Letter of Support: Save Oak Flats | ||||||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||||||
Approve the letter of support.
|
|||||||||
C. | Consideration and Approval of Contract: Cooperative Purchase Contract with Clark Equipment Company for one (1) Bobcat Toolcat in the amount of $71,896.48 from Clark Equipment Company, utilizing Sourcewell cooperative purchase contract #040319-CEC. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||
|
||||||
D. | Consideration and Approval of Final Plat: RP4V, LLC and RP40, LLC request approval of the Final Condominium Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multi-Family (PZ-19-00019-09), a 40-unit multi-family residential condominium subdivision. The 3.71-acre site is located at 1221 E. Emma Drive in the MR, Medium Density Residential Zone, and has a Resource Protection Overlay (RPO). | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||
Approve the Final Plat and authorize the Mayor to sign the Final Plat when notified by staff that all documents are ready for signature and recordation.
|
||||||
E. | Consideration and Approval of Final Plat: RP4V, LLC and RP40, LLC request approval of the Final Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multi-Family, a 6-unit multi-family residential townhome subdivision (PZ-19-00019-08). The 5.1-acre site is located at 1221 East Emma Drive in the MR, Medium Density Residential Zone, and has a Resource Protection Overlay (RPO). | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||
Approve the Final Plat and authorize the Mayor to sign the Final Plat when notified by staff that all documents are ready for signature and recordation.
|
||||||
F. | Consideration and Approval of Contract: Cooperative Purchase Contract with 72 Hour, LLC d/b/a National Auto Fleet Group for the purchase of One (1) New/Unused 2023 Ford Expedition in the amount of $61,326.18 through a Sourcewell cooperative contract. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||
|
||||||
G. | Consideration and Approval of Contract: Approve Amendment One of the Professional Services Contract with Arizona Water Buffalo, LLC with additional compensation not to exceed $57,465 for a total contract amount of $107,415 for Water Services Consulting Services. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||
|
||||||
H. | Consideration and Approval of Contract: Cooperative Purchase Contract with Empire Southwest, LLC for a Caterpillar 906 articulated loader in the amount of $133,698 on a National Intergovernmental Purchasing Alliance cooperative purchase agreement with the City of Tucson. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||
|
||||||
11. | PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS | |||||
A. | Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-28: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, Coconino County, Arizona, amending the Flagstaff City Code, Title 10, Flagstaff Zoning Code, Section 10-90.40.030 Rural Floodplain Map, to change the map designation of approximately 7.76 acres of real property from Rural Floodplain to Urban Floodplain on eight parcels of land (APNs 101-01-020A, 101-01-020B, 101-28-005G, 101-28-005H, 101-28-005K, 101-28-013A, 101-28-013B, and 101-28-013D) located generally between W Forest Avenue and N San Francisco Street; providing for severability and establishing an effective date. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||
At the November 1, 2022, Council Meeting:
1) Read Ordinance No. 2022-28 by title only for the first time 2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-28 by title only (if approved above) At the November 15, 2022, Council Meeting: 3) Read Ordinance No. 2022-28 by title only for the final time 4) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-28 by title only (if approved above) 5) Adopt Ordinance No. 2022-28 |
||||||
B. | Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2022-51 and Ordinance No. 2022-27: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, Coconino County, Arizona, declaring as a public record that certain document filed with the City Clerk entitled "PZ-19-00248 Updates to Zoning Code - Outdoor Lighting Standards" and an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff Coconino County, Arizona, amending the Flagstaff City Code, Title 10, Flagstaff Zoning Code, to modify the existing Outdoor Lighting Standards. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||
At the November 1, 2022, Council Meeting:
1) Read Resolution No. 2022-51 by title only for the first time 2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2022-51 by title only (if approved above) 3) Read Ordinance No. 2022-27 by title only for the first time 4) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-27 by title only (if approved above) At the November 15, 2022, Council Meeting: 5) Adopt Resolution No. 2022-51 6) Read Ordinance No. 2022-27 7) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-27 by title only (if approved above) 8) Adopt Ordinance No. 2022-27 |
||||||
12. | REGULAR AGENDA | |||||
A. | Consideration and Approval of Contract: Approve the Professional Engineering Services Contract with Burgess & Niple, Inc. in the amount of $716,401.00 for the Butler-Fourth Improvements Project. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||
|
||||||
B. | Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-30: An ordinance amending City Code to align City Code and industrial discharge permits with the language in Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 40, and Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||
At the November 1, 2022 Council Meeting:
1) Read Ordinance No. 2022-30 by title only for the first time 2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-30 by title only (if approved above) At the November 15, 2022 Council Meeting: 3) Read Ordinance No. 2022-30 by title only for the final time 4) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-30 by title only (if approved above) 5) Adopt Ordinance No. 2022-30 |
||||||
C. | Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2022-50: A resolution of the Flagstaff City Council adopting the Active Transportation Master Plan | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||
1) Read Resolution No. 2022-50 by title only
2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2022-50 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Resolution No.2022-50 |
||||||
D. | Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2022-52: A Resolution of the Flagstaff City Council, requiring that new construction and major renovation of all city-owned, non-housing section, occupied facilities achieve emissions-neutral operations, and that these same facilities shall be designed to support one or more functions of a “community resilience hub” to support vulnerable community members during disruptive events, and that in the event that a city-owned building or property is being vacated by the city, that the housing section first have the opportunity to evaluate the property and determine the feasibility of re-purposing or developing in a manner that supports increasing the number of available and affordable housing units, and repealing Resolution no. 2014-09. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||
1) Read Resolution No. 2022-52 by title only
2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2022-52 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2022-52 |
||||||
E. | Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-29: An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, amending section 1-07-001-0005, Salaries, of the Flagstaff City Code, and establishing an effective date. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||
At the November 1, 2022 Council Meeting:
1) Read Ordinance No. 2022-29 by title only for the first time 2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-29 by title only (if approved above) At the November 15, 2022 Council Meeting: 3) Read Ordinance No. 2022-29 by title only for the final time 4) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-29 by title only (if approved above) 5) Adopt Ordinance No. 2022-29 |
||||||
13. | DISCUSSION ITEMS | |||||
A. | Snow Readiness and Operations Update- PROSE / Public Works | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||
Discussion of the upcoming winter season preparations and parking restrictions. This discussion item is informational only.
- Public Works Streets Section snow operations
- Parks Section snow operations - Parking and community impacts |
||||||
B. | Discussion on Stormwater Credit Manual Revisions | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||
Staff recommends accepting the proposed revisions to the Stormwater Credit Manual and seeks direction from City Council to formalize those revisions.
|
||||||
C. | Discussion of potential Holiday Display Policy | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | ||||||
Discussion and direction to staff regarding potential establishment by resolution of a holiday display policy.
|
||||||
14. | PUBLIC PARTICIPATION | |||||
15. | INFORMATIONAL ITEMS TO/FROM MAYOR, COUNCIL, AND STAFF, AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEM REQUESTS | |||||
16. | ADJOURNMENT | |||||
|
4.A.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Approval of Minutes: City Council Regular Meeting of September 21, 2021, Special Work Session/Town Hall of September 24, 2021, Combined Special Meeting/Work Session of September 28, 2021, Regular Meeting of October 5, 2021, Special Meeting (Executive Session) of September 13, 2022, Special Meeting (Executive Session) of September 20, 2022, and Special Meeting (Executive Session) of September 27, 2022. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Approve the minutes of the City Council Regular Meeting of September 21, 2021, Special Work Session/Town Hall of September 24, 2021, Combined Special Meeting/Work Session of September 28, 2021, Regular Meeting of October 5, 2021, Special Meeting (Executive Session) of September 13, 2022, Special Meeting (Executive Session) of September 20, 2022, and Special Meeting (Executive Session) of September 27, 2022.
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
Minutes of City Council meetings are a requirement of Arizona Revised Statutes and, additionally, provide a method of informing the public of discussions and actions being taken by the City Council. | |||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
None | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
None | |||||
Connection to PBB Key Community Priorities/Objectives & Regional Plan: | |||||
Priority Based Budget Key Community Priorities and Objectives Effective Governance |
|||||
Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
None | |||||
Attachments: | 09.21.2021 CCRM | ||
09.24.2022.CCSWSTH | |||
09.28.2021 CCSMWS | |||
10.05.2022 CCRM | |||
09.13.2022 CCSMES | |||
09.20.2022 CCSMES | |||
09.27.2022 CCSMES |
8.A.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration of Appointments: Transportation Commission. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Make one appointment to a term expiring July 2023.
Make one appointments to a term expiring July 2025. Make one appointment to a term for an FUSD Representative seat expiring November 2025. Make one appointment to a term for a NAIPTA Representative seat expiring November 2025. |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The Transportation Commission consists of seven voting members (a representative from the Flagstaff Unified School District, a representative of NAIPTA and five citizens) and two non-voting members (City Traffic Engineer and a Police Department representative). The Transportation Commission reviews requests for changes in traffic regulations and formulates and recommends traffic-related policies and ordinances to the Council. The commission sponsors two subcommittees: the Bicycle Advisory Committee and the Pedestrian Advisory Committee, each consisting of seven voting members. There are currently three seats which are expired and one seat that is vacant due to a resignation. It is important to fill vacancies on boards and commissions quickly so as to allow them to continue meeting on a regular basis. There are seven applications on file. The applications on file are as follows:
COUNCIL APPOINTMENT ASSIGNMENT: Councilmember Shimoni, Mayor Deasy, Councilmember McCarthy, and Councilmember House |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
These are voluntary positions and there is no budgetary impact to the City of Flagstaff. | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
None. | |||||
Connection to PBB Priorities/Objectives, Carbon Neutrality Plan & Regional Plan: | |||||
There is no Council goal that specifically addresses appointments to boards and commissions; however, boards and commissions do provide input and recommendations based on City Council goals that may pertain to the board or commission work plan. | |||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
None. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1) Appoint four Commissioners: By appointing members at this time, the Transportation Commission will be at full membership, allowing the group to meet and provide recommendations to the City Council. 2) Table the action to allow for further discussion or expand the list of candidates. |
|||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
The City's boards, commissions, and committees were created to foster public participation and input and to encourage Flagstaff citizens to take an active role in city government. | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
INFORM: The vacancies are posted on the City's website and have been made known by City staff and current commission members through word of mouth. | |||||
Attachments: | Transporation Commission Authority |
8.B.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration of Appointments: Commission on Diversity Awareness. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Make one appointment to a term expiring September 2023.
Make three appointments to terms expiring September 2025. |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The Commission on Diversity Awareness consists of seven citizens who represent the diverse population of Flagstaff. The mission of the commission includes, but is not limited to, fostering mutual understanding, tolerance, respect, and awareness among all citizens; recognizing the different economic, cultural, social, religious, and ethnic groups within the City; cooperating in the development of educational programs dedicated to improving community relations and enlisting support of various groups to foster diversity awareness. There are four appointments to be made due to three expired terms and one resignation. There are eight applications on file for consideration by the Council as follows:
COUNCIL APPOINTMENT ASSIGNMENT: Councilmember Shimoni, Councilmember Aslan, Councilmember McCarthy, and Councilmember Salas |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
These are voluntary positions and there is no budgetary impact on the City of Flagstaff. | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
Not applicable. | |||||
Connection to PBB Priorities/Objectives, Carbon Neutrality Plan & Regional Plan: | |||||
There is no Council goal that specifically addresses appointments to Boards and Commissions; however, boards and commissions to provide input and recommendations based on City Council goals that may pertain to the board or commission work plan. | |||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
None | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
1) Appoint four Commissioners: By appointing four members at this time, the Commission on Diversity Awareness will be at full membership, allowing the group to meet and provide recommendations to the City Council. 2) Postpone the action to allow for further discussion or expand the list of candidates. |
|||||
Background/History: | |||||
The City's boards, commissions, and committees were created to foster public participation and input and to encourage Flagstaff citizens to take an active role in city government. | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
INFORM: The vacancies are posted on the City's website and individual recruitment and mention of the opening by Commission members and City staff has occurred, informing others of this vacancy through word of mouth. | |||||
Attachments: | CODA - Authority |
9.A.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Action on Liquor License Application: Andrea Dahlman Lekowitz "GoPuff," 2001 E. Huntington Drive, Suite 1, Series 10 (beer and wine store), New License. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Hold the public hearing.
The City Council has the option to: (1) Forward the application to the State with a recommendation for approval; (2) Forward the application to the State with no recommendation; (3) Forward the application to the State with a recommendation for denial based on information from staff, the testimony received at the public hearing and/or other factors. |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The liquor license process begins at the State level and applications are then forwarded to the respective municipality for posting of the property and holding a public hearing, after which the Council recommendation is forwarded back to the State. A series 10 license allows a retail store to sell beer and wine (no other spirituous liquors), only in the original unbroken package, to be taken away from the premises of the retailer and consumed off the premises. This is a non-quota type of license. GoPuff is an existing business in Flagstaff. If approved, it will be the 31st active series 10 license in Flagstaff. To view surrounding liquor licenses, please visit the Active Liquor Licenses Map. The property has been posted as required, and the Police and Community Development divisions have reviewed the application and provided their respective reports. |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
There is no budgetary impact to the City of Flagstaff as this is a recommendation to the State. | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
Not applicable. | |||||
Connection to PBB Priorities/Objectives, Carbon Neutrality Plan & Regional Plan: | |||||
Liquor licenses are a regulatory action and there are no Community Priorities that directly apply. | |||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
Not applicable. | |||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
Because the application is for a new license, consideration may be given to both the applicant's personal qualifications and the location. The deadline for issuing a recommendation on this application is November 4, 2022. |
|||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
This business will contribute to the tax base of the community. We are not aware of any other relevant considerations. | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
The application was properly posted on October 12, 2022. No written protests have been received to date. | |||||
Attachments: | Letter to Applicant | ||
Hearing Procedures | |||
Series 10 Description | |||
PD Memo | |||
Zoning Memo | |||
Map |
10.A.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Approval of Letter of Intent: City of Peace | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Approve the letter of intent.
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
A City of Peace, as officially defined by International Cities of Peace, is a community that endeavors to make progress against violence and foster a culture of peace. A Culture of Peace is determined by the citizens of each community. As a guideline, United Nations Resolution A/RES/52/13 defines a Culture of Peace as a set of values, attitudes, modes of behavior and ways of life that reject violence and prevent conflicts by tackling their root causes to solve problems through dialogue and negotiation among individuals, groups, and nations. | |||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
None. | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
None. | |||||
Connection to PBB Key Community Priorities/Objectives & Regional Plan: | |||||
Safe & Healthy Community,Inclusive & Engaged Community,Livable Community. | |||||
Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
No. | |||||
Attachments: | City of Peace Letter |
10.B.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Approval of Letter of Support: Save Oak Flats | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Approve the letter of support.
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
Oak Flat is an area about an hour east of Phoenix that is a sacred site known to Apaches as Chi’chil Bi?dagoteel. Home to a diverse desert ecosystem, it’s also currently federal land within the Tonto National Forest. In December 2014, a land-exchange rider to the must-pass National Defense Authorization Act Bill was added.. The bill included the Oak Flat land exchange which gave multinational mining company Resolution Copper this area, located in Tonto National Forest, to build one of the world’s largest copper mines, the largest in North America. The mine is slated to permanently decimate Oak Flat and surrounding desert features. Apache and mining-reform activists had been successfully fighting the proposal for nearly a decade before this “backroom deal” was made in Congress. Currently the Forest Service is undertaking an environmental impact statement, a legally mandated assessment that must be completed before the land exchange is finalized. We are fighting to repeal this land exchange. | |||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
None. | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
None. | |||||
Connection to PBB Key Community Priorities/Objectives & Regional Plan: | |||||
None. | |||||
Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
No. | |||||
Attachments: | Letter of Support |
10.C.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Approval of Contract: Cooperative Purchase Contract with Clark Equipment Company for one (1) Bobcat Toolcat in the amount of $71,896.48 from Clark Equipment Company, utilizing Sourcewell cooperative purchase contract #040319-CEC. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The Parks Section maintains 700-acres of park land, 58-miles of Flagstaff Urban Trails System (FUTS), miles of Bed, Board, and Beverage (BBB) tax improved streetscapes and spaces, as well as performs snow operations for the City frequently using utilitarian equipment. Providing the consistent service to the community of trail maintenance, park grounds maintenance and snow operations by adding this utilitarian equipment to the Parks fleet is a key ingredient to the overall success of the Section. The purchase of this equipment has been approved by the Fleet Management Committee and the Parks Section will use a Sourcewell cooperative purchase contract # 040319-CEC in order to provide the City better pricing. This equipment will replace a 1997 1.5 ton dump bed truck within the Section, which is not a like for like replacement as the Parks Section continues to strive for superior emissions and fuel efficiency, drivability on the roads and a larger array of attachments that accompany a proper grounds maintenance vehicle. The equipment warranty and services are supported locally by the City of Flagstaff Fleet Section. |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
The Parks Section has $80,000 budget capacity in the Rolling Stock line item within the Park Grounds Program for fiscal year 2022-2023 in account 001-11-155-0561-5-4401. | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
None | |||||
Connection to PBB Priorities/Objectives, Carbon Neutrality Plan & Regional Plan: | |||||
Priority Based Budget Key Community Priorities and Objectives
Safe & Healthy Community and Sustainable, Innovative Infrastructure by promoting physical health through providing recreational opportunities, parks, open space. Also providing multiple transportation options (maintenance of the FUTS) and deliver outstanding services to residents through a healthy, well maintained infrastructure system
Carbon Neutrality Plan CNP-1 Reduces greenhouse emissions from City operations by adjusting the replacement vehicle type to this utilitarian versus larger capacity dump bed truck
Regional Plan Goal E&C.2 Reduce greenhouse gas emissions
|
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
No | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
|
|||||
Background/History: | |||||
For fiscal year 2022-2023, the Parks Section was budgeted to replace an aging dump bed truck within the Sections' Fleet. With the overall review of Parks, Recreation, Open Space and Events during fiscal year 2021-2022, the Division began forward planning with adjustments for electric vehicles as well as utilitarian equipment such as the Bobcat Toolcat in lieu of high tonnage trucks. In 2021, Parks Section staff researched available utilitarian equipment, which included speaking with the grounds staff at Northern Arizona University (who uses this equipment exclusively for grounds maintenance and snow operations), as well as maintenance staff with Mountain Line. Staff determined that the Bobcat Toolcat was the perfect machine for the various tasks necessary to be performed. Examples of tasks range from trails maintenance, digging, turf maintenance, and landscape maintenance to snow operations. The first Bobcat Toolcat was brought into City of Flagstaff Fleet through the Parks Section in October 2021 making a large impact to the Parks snow operation. Purchasing this piece of equipment enables the Parks Section to perform maintenance tasks as well as different tasks on trails in a more effective and efficient manner. The equipment also opens up new attachments that could be used on athletic fields, trails, turf spaces and other landscaped areas within the parks system. Clark Equipment Company has Contract #040319-CEC with Sourcewell to supply materials and/or services, which was awarded through a competitive and open procurement process. The Procurement Department reviewed that cooperative purchase agreement and determined that it allowed for competitive pricing providing the best value for the purchase of the Bobcat Toolcat. |
|||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
The City of Flagstaff and Fleet Services have educated backgrounds working with Bobcat equipment and a local provider is available for warranty and post warranty repairs, if needed. | |||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
The community benefit will include a greater impact to park grounds, civic spaces and trails maintenance as well as snow operations with the Bobcat Toolcat.
|
|||||
Attachments: | Cooperative Purchase Contract | ||
Exhibit A Quote | |||
Toolcat Trails | |||
Exhibit B - Agency Contract | |||
Exhibit B - Agency Acceptance |
10.D.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Approval of Final Plat: RP4V, LLC and RP40, LLC request approval of the Final Condominium Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multi-Family (PZ-19-00019-09), a 40-unit multi-family residential condominium subdivision. The 3.71-acre site is located at 1221 E. Emma Drive in the MR, Medium Density Residential Zone, and has a Resource Protection Overlay (RPO). | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Approve the Final Plat and authorize the Mayor to sign the Final Plat when notified by staff that all documents are ready for signature and recordation.
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
A request for approval of the Final Condominium Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multi-Family, a 40-unit residential condominium subdivision located on 3.71 acres. The site also contains parking and landscaping, in addition to six townhome units from a previous development plan. These condominiums are being platted on top of Tract B and Tract C of the Final Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multifamily (case number PZ-19-00019-08), which governs the six existing townhome units on the site and the land underneath the townhome units. A concurrent amendment to the Final Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multifamily is also being processed to allow for the 40 new units to be sold individually as condominiums (the amendment will erase the property lines for six townhome lots that were never developed and clarify parking/access between the townhome and condominium owners). | |||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
No financial impacts are anticipated with this Final Plat. | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
No policy impacts are affiliated with this Final Plat. | |||||
Connection to PBB Priorities/Objectives, Carbon Neutrality Plan & Regional Plan: | |||||
Carbon Neutrality Plan
|
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
|
|||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
|
|||||
Background/History: | |||||
Development History The subject site is located at located at 1221 E. Emma Dr. on the north side of East Pine Knoll Drive and east of Lone Tree Road. The Rio Homes Unit 4 development was originally intended in the mid-2000s to be a cohousing type of community and included a larger parcel intended for a common house. The original 2005 subdivision plat proposed variety of detached and attached residential building types across 21 lots and 9 tracts. The only structures from the original development plan that were ultimately built were six townhome units, each with an associated detached garage (two of the garages have an accessory dwelling unit on the second floor). A first amendment to the Rio Homes Unit 4 subdivision was approved by City Council in 2020 (and recorded in 2021) to allow for the development of 40 additional multi-family residential units.The amendment modified the 2005 plat to create 12 lots and 3 tracts to allow for the development of 40 multifamily residential units (rental apartments). It maintained the lot lines for the townhomes and garages that had already been developed but removed most of the lot lines that had not been developed. City staff approved the Site Plan for the 40 residential units on March 26, 2020 (Civil Plans were approved on July 10, 2020, and Building Permits were approved on November 11, 2021). The developer has decided to turn the 40 multi-family residential units into condominiums so that they can be sold individually. The condominiums are located on Tracts B and C of the Final Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multifamily. City staff administratively approved the Final Condominium Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multi-Family on October 3, 2022. The Final Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multi-Family (a second amendment to the Rio Homes Unit 4 subdivision plat) is being processed concurrently with the Final Condominium Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multi-Family. The purpose of the concurrent amendment (case number PZ-19-00019-08) is to erase the property lines for four townhome lots that were never developed. The amendment also clarifies parking/access between the townhome and condominium owners. Type of Plat This application is for a condominium plat, which takes a multi-unit complex, such as the subject property, and creates the potential for individually owned units. The Final Plat delineates all the elements affiliated with the individual units. In this case, the units are defined as the airspace within each unit. The vertical boundaries start at the finish floor elevation (FFE) of each unit and extend to the ceiling of that unit. The horizontal boundaries start at the inside of the walls enclosing each unit. Decks, porches, external stairs, and parking spaces associated with specific units are also being platted as Limited Common Elements (LCEs). All areas outside of the units and the LCEs are platted as Common Elements (CEs). The condominiums are also being platted on top of Tracts B and C of the Final Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multi-Family. Tract A of the Final Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multi-Family is not included in the Condominium Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4. |
|||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
The City Council shall find the Final Plat meets the findings for approval, which is compliance with the following City Code sections:
|
|||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
This Final Plat facilitates the addition of 40 new for-sale housing units to the existing six townhome units on the Rio Homes Unit 4 site. The new housing will be a mix of one-bedroom and two-bedroom apartments. | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
Inform. No public hearings or public outreach are required by either the Zoning Code or the Subdivision Code as part of a Final Plat subdivision review process. | |||||
Attachments: | Application | ||
Final Plat | |||
Presentation |
10.E.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Approval of Final Plat: RP4V, LLC and RP40, LLC request approval of the Final Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multi-Family, a 6-unit multi-family residential townhome subdivision (PZ-19-00019-08). The 5.1-acre site is located at 1221 East Emma Drive in the MR, Medium Density Residential Zone, and has a Resource Protection Overlay (RPO). | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Approve the Final Plat and authorize the Mayor to sign the Final Plat when notified by staff that all documents are ready for signature and recordation.
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
A request for approval of the Final Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multi-Family, a 6-unit multi-family residential townhome subdivision. The developer is proposing to amend the previous Rio Homes Unit 4 plat to erase existing lot lines, and clarify parking and access issues, so that 40 additional multifamily residential housing units currently being built on the site can be sold individually as condos (the condominium plat is being processed concurrently through the Final Condominium Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multi-Family, application number: PZ-19-00019-09). | |||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
No financial impacts are anticipated with this Final Plat. | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
No policy impacts are affiliated with this Final Plat. | |||||
Connection to PBB Priorities/Objectives, Carbon Neutrality Plan & Regional Plan: | |||||
Carbon Neutrality Plan
|
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
|
|||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
|
|||||
Background/History: | |||||
Development History The subject site is located at located at 1221 E. Emma Dr. on the north side of East Pine Knoll Drive and east of Lone Tree Road. The Rio Homes Unit 4 development was originally intended in the mid-2000s to be a cohousing type of community and included a larger parcel intended for a common house. The original 2005 subdivision plat proposed variety of detached and attached residential building types across 21 lots and 9 tracts. The only structures from the original development plan that were ultimately built were six townhome units, each with an associated detached garage (two of the garages have an accessory dwelling unit on the second floor). A first amendment to the Rio Homes Unit 4 subdivision was approved by City Council in 2020 (and recorded in 2021) to allow for the development of 40 additional multi-family residential units.The amendment modified the 2005 plat to create 12 lots and 3 tracts to allow for the development of 40 multifamily residential units (rental apartments). It maintained the lot lines for the townhomes and garages that had already been developed but removed most of the lot lines that had not been developed. City staff approved the Site Plan for the 40 residential units on March 26, 2020 (Civil Plans were approved on July 10, 2020, and Building Permits were approved on November 11, 2021). The developer has decided to turn the 40 multifamily residential units into condominiums so that they can be sold individually. The condominiums are located on Tracts B and C the Final Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multifamily and are being processed concurrently in a separate application (Final Condominium Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multifamily PZ-19-00019-09). The Final Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multifamily is a second amendment to the Rio Homes Unit 4 subdivision plat. The purpose of the request is to erase the property lines for four townhome lots that were never developed so that the multifamily residential units being built in these locations can be sold individually. The amendment also clarifies parking/access between the townhome and condominium owners. Staff also administratively approved this plat on October 3, 2022 Type of Plat This second amendment to the Final Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Multi-Family is for a townhome subdivision consisting of 6 townhome lots and associated garages. All areas in the subdivision not allocated as lots are reserved as tracts. There are three tracts. The purposes of Tract A are: access, ingress/egress, parking, common element, and open space. The purposes of Tract B are: common element, open space, resource protection, drainage maintenance easement, and multifamily development. The purposes of Tract C are: ingress/egress, parking, common element, and open space. |
|||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
The City Council shall find the Final Plat meets the findings for approval, which is compliance with the following City Code sections:
|
|||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
This amendment will facilitate the addition of 40 new for-sale housing units to the existing six townhome units on the Rio Homes Unit 4 site (through the concurrent Final Plat for Rio Homes Unit 4 Condominiums, case number PZ-19-00019-09). The new housing will be a mix of one-bedroom and two-bedroom apartments. | |||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
Inform. No public hearings or public outreach are required by either the Zoning Code or the Subdivision Code as part of a Final Plat subdivision review process. | |||||
Attachments: | Application | ||
Final Plat | |||
Presentation |
10.F.
| |||||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Approval of Contract: Cooperative Purchase Contract with 72 Hour, LLC d/b/a National Auto Fleet Group for the purchase of One (1) New/Unused 2023 Ford Expedition in the amount of $61,326.18 through a Sourcewell cooperative contract. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The Flagstaff Fire Department (FFD) is looking to purchase a 2023 Ford Expedition for assignment to a Battalion Chief position. FFD plans to rotate a 2000 Ford Expedition (F2010) out of front line service which currently has 149,115 miles on it. The new vehicle will be used in support of City Fire suppression operations and on assignment for out of district fire operations and training. The new vehicle will carry an extensive amount of equipment in support of these operations. Currently, there are no alternative fueled vehicles produced by manufacturers in the class of vehicles necessary to maintain the equipment needed by FFD. However, in support of the City's carbon neutrality goals, FFD chose a vehicle with a six (6) cylinder, 3.5 L Ecoboost engine as opposed to a eight (8) cylinder or diesel engine option. | |||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
FFD has budgeted funding for this vehicle in Fiscal Year 2022-2023 for the purchase of F2010's replacement in the amount of $61,326.18. Most of these dollars have been carried forward from two (2) prior fiscal years in hopes that there would be an alternate fueled vehicle that would meet the service requirements. Unfortunately, FFD must act now in order to supply the required personnel with reliable and effective equipment. This purchase will be paid fully from account 001-03-051-0203-2-4401. |
|||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
None.
|
|||||
Connection to PBB Priorities/Objectives, Carbon Neutrality Plan & Regional Plan: | |||||
Priority Based Budget Key Community Priorities and Objectives
DD-6: Proactively invest to protect Flagstaff's clean air status. Choosing a 3.5L Ecoboost 6 cylinder engine over a larger gas or diesel engine.
Regional Plan Policy E.2.I. Promote renewable energy sources that reduce demand upon fossil fuels and other forms of generation that produce waste.
Policy PF.3.I Maintain high-quality effectiveness and efficiency in law enforcement, fire, and emergency services to the extent that is consistent with governmental operations, plans, public policies, population served and monies available. |
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
No. | |||||
Background/History: | |||||
The City of Flagstaff Procurement department utilized cooperative purchase agreement 091521-NAF through Sourcewell in order to obtain the best pricing for the vehicle. | |||||
Attachments: | Cooperative Purchase Contract | ||
Exhibit A - Quote | |||
Exhibit B - Agency Contract |
10.G.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Approval of Contract: Approve Amendment One of the Professional Services Contract with Arizona Water Buffalo, LLC with additional compensation not to exceed $57,465 for a total contract amount of $107,415 for Water Services Consulting Services. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The Water Services Director position became vacant on May 27, 2022. The City selected Andy Bertelsen as an internal interim Water Resources Director, but also entered into a Professional Services Contract for Water Services Consulting Services with Brad Hill of Arizona Water Buffalo, LLC for subject matter consultation. Andy Bertelsen left City employment and the City hired Arizona Water Buffalo, LLC, Brad Hill, under the Professional Services Contract as a Water Services Executive Consultant to act as the Interim Water Services Director during the recruiting process with an outside Executive Recruiter. Brad Hill was hired as a direct result of his intimate knowledge and experience with the City's water programs, facilities, needs and processes. Amendment One is needed to cover the additional time that services are needed due to the longer than anticipated recruitment, and to assist the City with a transition to a new Water Services Director resulting from the recruitment. |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
City staff will use available salary savings and budget capacity to cover this additional $57,465 expense. | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
This Amendment One would not impact any City policies. | |||||
Connection to PBB Priorities/Objectives, Carbon Neutrality Plan & Regional Plan: | |||||
Priority Based Budget Key Community Priorities and Objectives
Enhance the organization's fiscal stability and increase efficiency and effectiveness
Become an employer of choice and provide employees with the necessary tools, training, and support |
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
No. | |||||
Attachments: | Amendment One Contract | ||
Exhibit A - Scope |
10.H.
| |||||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Approval of Contract: Cooperative Purchase Contract with Empire Southwest, LLC for a Caterpillar 906 articulated loader in the amount of $133,698 on a National Intergovernmental Purchasing Alliance cooperative purchase agreement with the City of Tucson. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The Solid Waste Collections Section is looking to purchase a Caterpillar 906 articulated loader for the primary use of loading bulk trash from the curb, sidewalks and streets into rear loading collection trash trucks during bulk trash collection process. This program has three (3) rear loading trucks but only one (1) articulated tractor. The current articulated tractor was purchased in 2015 and has over 33,000 hours of use on it. It is staff's goal to field both trucks in the bulk collection process, thus increasing productivity as well as employee safety. This will be achieved because the new equipment will limit the amount of time employees are required to hand toss large bulk trash/green waste piles into the back of collection trucks. This articulated loader does not require a Commercial Drivers License to operate, which will make staffing it use easier. This addition to the Solid Waste Collections Fleet was approved the the City of Flagstaff's Fleet Management Committee. |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
The Solid Waste Residential Section has budgeted funding in Fiscal Year 2022-2023 of $133,698 for the purchase of a Caterpillar 906 articulated loader in account 211-06-166-0641-0-4401. | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
N/A
|
|||||
Connection to PBB Priorities/Objectives, Carbon Neutrality Plan & Regional Plan: | |||||
Priority Based Budget Key Community Priorities and Objectives
|
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
No | |||||
Background/History: | |||||
Empire Southwest, LLC holds a Local Government Purchasing Cooperative Contract #161534-01 with the City of Tucson Procurement Department, Public Sector to supply materials and/or services, which was awarded through a competitive and open procurement process. Empire Southwest, LLC is a dealer of Caterpillar equipment and the City has authority to enter into a Cooperative Purchase Contract to purchase the Caterpillar 906 articulated loader. | |||||
Attachments: | Cooperative Purchase Agreement | ||
Exhibit A - Quote | |||
Cat 906 picture in action | |||
Exhibit B - Agency Contract |
11.A.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-28: An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, Coconino County, Arizona, amending the Flagstaff City Code, Title 10, Flagstaff Zoning Code, Section 10-90.40.030 Rural Floodplain Map, to change the map designation of approximately 7.76 acres of real property from Rural Floodplain to Urban Floodplain on eight parcels of land (APNs 101-01-020A, 101-01-020B, 101-28-005G, 101-28-005H, 101-28-005K, 101-28-013A, 101-28-013B, and 101-28-013D) located generally between W Forest Avenue and N San Francisco Street; providing for severability and establishing an effective date. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
At the November 1, 2022, Council Meeting:
1) Read Ordinance No. 2022-28 by title only for the first time 2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-28 by title only (if approved above) At the November 15, 2022, Council Meeting: 3) Read Ordinance No. 2022-28 by title only for the final time 4) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-28 by title only (if approved above) 5) Adopt Ordinance No. 2022-28 |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
This request is for a Zoning Code Text Amendment to amend Section 10-90.40.030 of the Zoning Code, the Rural Floodplain Map, to change the map designation of approximately 7.76 acres from Rural Floodplain to Urban Floodplain on eight parcels of land (APNs 101-01-020A, 101-01-020B, 101-28-005G, 101-28-005H, 101-28-005K, 101-28-013A, 101-28-013B, and 101-28-013D) located generally between W Forest Avenue and N San Francisco Street. | |||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
There are no anticipated financial impacts affiliated with the proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment. | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
There are no anticipated policy impacts affiliated with the proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment. |
|||||
Connection to PBB Priorities/Objectives, Carbon Neutrality Plan & Regional Plan: | |||||
Priority Based Budget Key Community Priorities and Objectives
Promote, protect & enhance a healthy, sustainable environment & its natural resources.
Ensure the built environment is safe through the use of consistent standards, rules & regulations, & land use practices. Carbon Neutrality Plan Ensure all mitigation actions improve Flagstaff's ability to adapt to the future.
Regional Plan
Staff's analysis of the Regional Plan's goals and policies is included below under Key Considerations under the Zoning Code Text Amendment Criteria hearing, Finding #1 of this report.
|
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
There has not been a previous City Council decision on this ordinance. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
The City Council may adopt, modify, or deny the proposed amendment. | |||||
Background/History: | |||||
The Zoning Code includes a Resource Protection Overlay (RPO) that was originally adopted in June 1999 and applied to vacant parcels greater than five acres at the time of adoption. The purpose of the RPO is to provide standards for the protection of natural resources, including floodplains, steep slopes, and forest. The requirements are meant to ensure that proposed development is consistent with the character of its natural surroundings. Floodplains (both Rural and Urban) are the highest priority resource to be protected on a site. Floodplains are categorized as either urban or rural based on the descriptions below. 1. Urban Floodplains. All watercourses and associated floodplains not defined as rural floodplains are urban floodplains. Urban floodplains are typically located in urbanized areas and have typically been altered from their natural state by channelization. Urban floodplains may be altered to address conveyance and erosion concerns, provided that all necessary requirements of the City’s Stormwater Regulations as administered by the Stormwater Manager are addressed. However, certain urban floodplains that have characteristics conducive to water quality, wildlife habitat, and stream ecology should be preserved. Proposals for any disturbance of these watercourses shall be reviewed by the Stormwater Manager and must address these attributes and provide for mitigation if necessary. Undergrounding of urban floodplains is strongly discouraged, and a justification must be provided prior to any approval of undergrounding. 2. Rural Floodplains. Rural floodplains are natural undisturbed open spaces that are unsuitable for development purposes due to periodic flood inundation and the need to preserve the stream corridor for beneficial uses such as the preservation of important ecological resources. Rural floodplains are delineated in Section 10-90.40.030, Rural Floodplain Map, and defined as areas of delineated 100-year floodplain that cannot be disturbed or developed except for roadway and utility crossings. Rural floodplains cannot be altered through a floodplain map amendment or revision and must remain undisturbed (i.e., 100 percent protection). The extension of rural floodplains beyond the limits of the delineated floodplains, both upstream and laterally, may be required based on more current or extended floodplain studies, master plan documents or other studies or documents related to hydrology, hydraulics, stream geomorphology, wildlife habitat, or wildlife corridors. The proposed amendment is to change the map designation of approximately 7.76 acres from Rural Floodplain to Urban Floodplain. The applicant’s request is specific to their parcel APN 101-28-005H. The Rural Floodplain encumbers approximately 1.96 acres of the applicant’s 3.35-acre parcel. The applicant contends that the existing floodplain has been altered by adjacent development making the Rural Floodplain designation incongruent with the description provided in the Zoning Code. The applicant states that the correct designation is Urban Floodplain. The applicant is only requesting this designation be changed on their property. Staff believes that if the adjacent floodplain areas have been altered as is described in this application, they also no longer meet the description of Rural Floodplain and have included these areas as part of the Zoning Code Text Amendment. This area of Rural Floodplain is bounded on the north by W Forest Avenue. The floodplain bisects two parcels of land owned by Northern Arizona Healthcare (NAH). The floodplain is primarily located on land owned by the City of Flagstaff running in between the NAH properties, however, portions of the floodplain still overlap one of the parcels owned by NAH. As the floodplain moves further south it encumbers another parcel owned by NAH. NAH has provided written support to join this application (see attachment). Beyond the NAH parcels is a parcel that is occupied by the Flagstaff YMCA. A portion of this parcel (most of which is encumbered by the floodplain) has been dedicated to the City of Flagstaff as right-of-way. The applicant’s parcel is directly south of the YMCA and the City right-of-way. There are two additional vacant properties (owner has also submitted a letter to be included in this application) and the Northland Hospice site at the southern extent of this floodplain. The applicant states as part of their concept plan narrative that the project site is challenging due to constraints across the entire parcel including man-made slopes from the Switzer Canyon Road fill slope as well as moderate to dense tree coverage and 1.96 acres of the total site are within the Rural Floodplain. This leaves approximately 1.39 acres to hit a minimum density of 34 units. The applicant’s property is currently zoned High Density Residential and is located within the RPO. The minimum density required is 10 units per acre (3.35 x 10 = 33.5 or 34 units). The maximum density allowed for a parcel outside of an activity center and within the RPO is 22 units per acre (3.35 x 22 = 73.7 or 74 units). The applicant is proposing to develop approximately 0.36 acres of the designated Flood Fringe (within the 100-year floodplain outside of the floodway) leaving the remaining 1.37 acres as undisturbed open space. Residential development within the 100-year floodplain is required to be constructed so that the finished floor of livable space is a minimum of one foot above the 100-year floodplain as determined by the FEMA flood maps. The applicant’s proposed residential design includes two floors of livable space above a bottom floor garage which would assist with these elevation requirements. Existing and potential development on the surrounding parcels based on existing zoning includes the following:
|
|||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
An application for a Zoning Text Amendment shall be submitted to the Planning Director and shall be reviewed and a recommendation prepared. The Planning Director’s recommendation shall be transmitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission in the form of a staff report prior to a scheduled public hearing. The recommendation shall include: an evaluation of the consistency and conformance of the proposed amendment with the goals and policies of the General Plan and any applicable specific plans; the grounds for the recommendation based on the standards and purposes of the zones set forth in Section 10-40.20 (Establishment of Zones) of the Zoning Code; and whether the amendment should be granted or denied. A Zoning Code Text Amendment shall be evaluated based on the following findings: A. Finding #1:The proposed amendment is consistent with and conforms to the objectives and policies of the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. The proposed amendment is to resolve a conflict in the Rural Floodplain Map. The existing Switzer Wash within the subject area has been significantly altered through various development projects over time and no longer meets the intent and purpose of the Rural Floodplain. This amendment will change the designation from Rural Floodplain to Urban Floodplain. The Regional Plan does not specifically address Rural versus Urban Floodplain as described in the Zoning Code. Floodplains in general are considered environmentally sensitive lands which are covered in the Regional Plan on page IV-16. The plan states, “These areas contain critical resources and require special consideration in the development design and review process.” The following goals and policies apply to this application: Goal E&C.7 Give special consideration to environmentally sensitive lands in the development and review process.
The Environmental Planning & Conservation Chapter of the Regional Plan includes two maps that help identify concentration of natural resources in Flagstaff. Map 7: Significant Natural Resource: Wildlife, Vegetation, Hydrology and Geology identifies the subject areas as a potential site for Riparian Vegetation. A visit to this site shows only Ponderosa Pine and native grasses and typical riparian vegetation. Map 8: Concentration of Natural Resources shows the subject area in the moderate range of resource concentration without further indication of the resource identified in this area. The area is not identified as a Watchable Wildlife Area. Both maps include notes that the indication of natural resources does not preclude private development entitlements. Other provisions of the Regional Plan that apply to this application are found in the Stormwater and Watershed Management section covered on page VI-14. This section identifies that watercourse preservation and restoration is a critical and necessary part of stormwater and watershed management. The following goals and policies apply to this application: Goal WR.5. Manage watersheds and stormwater to address flooding concerns, water quality, environmental protections, and rainwater harvesting.
The proposed amendment can be found consistent and conforms to the objectives and policies of the Regional Plan. There are no specific plans that cover this area. B. Finding #2: The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City. The proposed amendment is not anticipated to be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. This amendment will resolve a conflict in the Rural Floodplain Map. C. Finding #3: The proposed amendment is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code. The current indicated area is inconsistent with the description of Rural Floodplains. Rural floodplains are described as “…natural undisturbed open spaces that are unsuitable for development purposes due to periodic flood inundation and the need to preserve the stream corridor for beneficial uses such as the preservation of important ecological resources.” The Zoning Code describes the Urban Floodplain as watercourses “…in urbanized areas [that] have typically been altered from their natural state by channelization.” The applicant has provided a biological evaluation of the Switzer Wash in the subject area prepared by Natural Channel Design, Inc. in 2003. The report states the following: “The primary limiting factors to the biological and physical functions of Switzer Creek are direct manipulations of the channel and floodplain during past construction of surrounding roads, utility pipelines, and other infrastructure. In several places the channel and floodplain have been significantly narrowed and/or completely realigned. Large rock has been added to the banks and channel presumably to minimize erosion. Extensive spoil piles limit access to the active floodplain. Steep road embankments contribute to increases sediment supplies. Channel realignments have pushed the channel into dense thickets of Ponderosa pine. The cumulative impact of these modifications limits the function of the riparian system.” The proposed amendments enhance the Zoning Code’s internal consistency by resolving a conflict on the Rural Floodplain Map pertaining to the subject property. |
|||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
In accordance with State Statute and the Zoning Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission work session and public hearing for this amendment was advertised in the Arizona Daily Sun on September 10, 2022. Also, persons of interest that are on file with the Planning and Development Services Section were notified of the work sessions and hearings via first class mail. The applicant also held a neighborhood meeting inviting all property owners within 300 feet. The meeting was held on August 25th from 10:00 a.m. to noon on the parcel. Approximately 24 members of the public attended the meeting but only 11 attendees signed in. Concerns presented included the following:
|
|||||
Attachments: | Application | ||
Zoning Code Text Amendment Narrative | |||
Letter from Northern Arizona Healthcare | |||
Letter from Testan Properties LLC | |||
Regional Plan Map 7 | |||
Regional Plan Map 8 | |||
Citizen Participation Plan | |||
Public Comments | |||
Ord. 2022-28 | |||
Exhibit A | |||
Presentation |
11.B.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2022-51 and Ordinance No. 2022-27: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, Coconino County, Arizona, declaring as a public record that certain document filed with the City Clerk entitled "PZ-19-00248 Updates to Zoning Code - Outdoor Lighting Standards" and an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff Coconino County, Arizona, amending the Flagstaff City Code, Title 10, Flagstaff Zoning Code, to modify the existing Outdoor Lighting Standards. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
At the November 1, 2022, Council Meeting:
1) Read Resolution No. 2022-51 by title only for the first time 2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2022-51 by title only (if approved above) 3) Read Ordinance No. 2022-27 by title only for the first time 4) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-27 by title only (if approved above) At the November 15, 2022, Council Meeting: 5) Adopt Resolution No. 2022-51 6) Read Ordinance No. 2022-27 7) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-27 by title only (if approved above) 8) Adopt Ordinance No. 2022-27 |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The purpose of Division 10-50.70: Outdoor Lighting Standards is to help assure that dark skies remain a resource to be enjoyed by the Flagstaff community and its visitors, minimize light pollution and light trespass across property lines, maintain an environment that the City’s astronomical industry depends upon, reduce energy consumptions, minimize the potential disruption to nocturnal ecosystems, and to allow safe and efficient outdoor lighting. The City was recognized as the world’s first International Dark Sky City on October 24, 2001, for its pioneering development and implementation of lighting codes that balance the need to preserve Flagstaff’s dark sky resource with the need for safe outdoor lighting practices. In 2019, a Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) was completed for Coconino County. The JLUS is a cooperative land use planning effort between local governments and military installations. Its goal is to ensure the lasting compatibility of military installations and their nearby communities. There are two U.S. Naval Observatory Sites in the Flagstaff region which rely on dark sky conditions to conduct their missions. The JLUS contains specific implementation strategies for the City of Flagstaff. These strategies focus on updating the Zoning Code to remove Lighting Zone 3 as well as modernize measurement of absolute lumens to account for the increasing use of Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting. A working group was formed in late 2019 to begin working on revisions to the Outdoor Lighting Standards as suggested by the JLUS. |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
There are no anticipated financial impact affiliated with the proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment. | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
There are no anticipated policy impacts affiliated with the proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment. | |||||
Connection to PBB Priorities/Objectives, Carbon Neutrality Plan & Regional Plan: | |||||
Priority Based Budget Key Community Priorities and Objectives
Implement innovative local government programs, new ideas, & best practices; be recognized as a model for others to follow.
Achieve a well-maintained community through comprehensive & equitable code compliance & development that is compatible with community values. Carbon Neutrality Plan Ensure all mitigation actions improve Flagstaff's ability to adapt to the future.
Regional Plan Staff's analysis of the Regional Plan's goals and policies is included below under Key Considerations under the Zoning Code Text Amendment Criteria heading, Finding #1 of this report.
|
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
There has not been a previous City Council decision on this ordinance. | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
The City Council may adopt, modify, or deny the proposed amendment. | |||||
Background/History: | |||||
The proposed amendment (Attachment 1) includes multiple changes to the Zoning Code. New provisions are being added, and several existing regulations are being deleted or modified. The most significant of the modifications include:
Purpose (Section 10-50.70.010):
|
|||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
An application for a Zoning Text Amendment shall be submitted to the Planning Director and shall be reviewed and a recommendation prepared. The Planning Director’s recommendation shall be transmitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission in the form of a staff report prior to a scheduled public hearing. The recommendation shall include: an evaluation of the consistency and conformance of the proposed amendment with the goals and policies of the General Plan and any applicable specific plans; the grounds for the recommendation based on the standards and purposes of the zones set forth in Section 10-40.20 (Establishment of Zones) of the Zoning Code; and whether the amendment should be granted or denied. A Zoning Code Text Amendment shall be evaluated based on the following findings: A. Finding #1: The proposed amendment is consistent with and conforms to the objectives and policies of the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. The Regional Plan analysis supports the proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment as part of the required findings. The Regional Plan has 97 goals and over 508 policies, which sometimes conflict or are given different weight in decision-making. The applicable policies are analyzed by chapter below.Conflicting goals and policies are found in Chapter VII – Energy, which supports energy efficiency. NSLEDs are less energy efficient than full spectrum LEDs. Chapter IV - Environmental Planning & Conservation
B. Finding #2: The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. The proposed amendment is not anticipated to be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. C. Finding #3:The proposed amendment is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code. The proposed amendment revises the entire Outdoor Lighting Standards Division of the Zoning Code. In addition, definitions, associated maps, signage, and legal nonconforming standards have been updated to coordinate with the rewrite of this division. |
|||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
Staff completed the following efforts to reach out for public input on the proposed amendment prior to scheduling work sessions or public hearings:
|
|||||
Attachments: | Application | ||
Res. 2022-51 | |||
Exhibit A | |||
Ord. 2022-27 | |||
Public Participation Plan | |||
Presentation |
12.A.
| |||||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Approval of Contract: Approve the Professional Engineering Services Contract with Burgess & Niple, Inc. in the amount of $716,401.00 for the Butler-Fourth Improvements Project. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
|
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
|
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
This Professional Engineering Services Contract will be funded by Transportation Tax- Roadway, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Safety Improvements –Street Widening- Butler-Fourth Improvements fund from the authorized FY 23 budget of $6,638,342.00, Acct #048-10-118-3047-6. | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
N/A
|
|||||
Connection to PBB Priorities/Objectives, Carbon Neutrality Plan & Regional Plan: | |||||
Priority Based Budget Key Community Priorities and Objectives
|
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
On March 29, 2022, this project was presented for discussion at a Council Work Session Meeting. The project scope and approach were discussed, public comment received, and direction provided to move forward with advertisement for project design. |
|||||
Background/History: | |||||
Purchasing staff issued a Request for Statement of Qualifications (RSOQ) solicitation for engineering professional services, and it was published in the Arizona Daily Sun on May 29 and June 5, 2022. Purchasing posted the RSOQ on PlanetBids, the City of Flagstaff’s Bidding platform, on May 20, 2022, and closed the invitation on June 20, 2022. The City received three Statements of Qualifications from engineering consultant firms. A seven-member Selection Committee consisted of City staff and one local contractor reviewed and evaluated the statements. Based upon the numerical scoring of the SOQs, the Selection Committee recommended negotiation of a scope and fee proposal with Burgess & Niple, Inc. Final scores of all firms are as follows: Burgess & Niple, Inc 648 Shephard-Wesnitzer, Inc 631 The WLB Group, Inc 539 Burgess & Niple, Inc. is highly qualified to deliver the design for the project and demonstrated the knowledge and experience to perform the public engagement, while also considering alternative design/evaluation metrics. |
|||||
Attachments: | Professional Engineering Services Contract | ||
Exhibit A - Scope and Fees | |||
Project Location Map | |||
Presentation |
12.B.
| |||||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-30: An ordinance amending City Code to align City Code and industrial discharge permits with the language in Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 40, and Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 403. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
At the November 1, 2022 Council Meeting:
1) Read Ordinance No. 2022-30 by title only for the first time 2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-30 by title only (if approved above) At the November 15, 2022 Council Meeting: 3) Read Ordinance No. 2022-30 by title only for the final time 4) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-30 by title only (if approved above) 5) Adopt Ordinance No. 2022-30 |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
Water Services is proposing the following changes after an audit was conducted by PG Environmental as an agent for the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) in June 2022. There are 3 proposed code changes that will align the verbiage found in EPA 40 CFR 403 with City Code and Industrial discharge permits.
|
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
None. Flagstaff Water Services contacted the industrial users impacted by the change. The change is only to the timeframe for submitting results to the City after an exceedance. The change does not incur any additional sampling costs for the industries. |
|||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
The City of Flagstaff has a pretreatment program as directed by the Arizona Pollution Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) permits for both water reclamation plants. This program issues discharge permits to industries that qualify under the classifications found in City code 7-02-001-0009. These proposed changes will align the City code to match EPA language to keep the City of Flagstaff in compliance with ADEQ and EPA. The impact to the current permitted industrial users will be minimal. | |||||
Connection to PBB Priorities/Objectives, Carbon Neutrality Plan & Regional Plan: | |||||
The changes to the pretreatment program support the Priority Based Budget Key Community Priorities and Objectives Environmental Stewardship - Promote, protect, & enhance a healthy, sustainable environment & its natural resources by aligning itself closely with EPA regulations. | |||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
Water Services provided a presentation to the Water Commission on September 15, 2022. | |||||
Attachments: | Ord. 2022-30 | ||
7-02 changes presentation |
12.C.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2022-50: A resolution of the Flagstaff City Council adopting the Active Transportation Master Plan | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
1) Read Resolution No. 2022-50 by title only
2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2022-50 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Resolution No.2022-50 |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
This resolution will adopt the City’s Active Transportation Master Plan (ATMP), a guide to enhance walking and biking by making them more useful, comfortable, safe, attractive and convenient as modes of transportation. Over the years, a variety of City of Flagstaff plans and policy documents have highlighted the importance of walking and biking, starting with the Flagstaff Regional Plan. The ATMP advances the City’s vision and goals for walking and biking by providing direction and details on becoming a more pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly community. | |||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
The ATMP helps guide City capital expenditures, through identification and prioritization of a variety of pedestrian and bicycle projects to be built over the next 20 years with funding from the transportation sales tax and First Mile Last Mile grant. The plan also positions the City to pursue grants and other opportunities to build walking and biking infrastructure. Adoption of the ATMP does not have a direct financial impact; however in the future additional funding and staff resources will be required to implement programmatic recommendations in the plan. Additional maintenance resources will also be needed to take care of new pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure as recommended in the draft ATMP. |
|||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
The ATMP does not change existing Regional Plan goals and policies relevant to walking and biking, but it does provide additional detail regarding how to implement them. The document also includes its own goals, policies, and strategies for walking and biking. There are 32 policies organized around six topics – infrastructure, maintenance and operations, support and encouragement, safety, transportation and land use planning, and evaluation – as well as a long list of detailed strategies and actions for each of the 32 policies. | |||||
Connection to PBB Priorities/Objectives, Carbon Neutrality Plan & Regional Plan: | |||||
Priority Based Budget Key Community Priorities and Objectives Safe & Healthy Community Foster a safe, secure, and healthy community Inclusive & Engaged Community Advance social equity and social justice in Flagstaff Enhance community outreach and engagement opportunities Ensure city facilities, services, and programs are accessible for all residents Sustainable, Innovative Infrastructure Deliver outstanding services to residents through a healthy, well maintained infrastructure system Utilize existing long-range plan(s) that identify the community's future infrastructure needs and all associated costs Identify smart traffic management, multi-modal transportation, and alternative energy opportunities Livable Community Provide amenities and activities that support a healthy lifestyle Environmental Stewardship Implement sustainable building practices and alternative energy and transportation options Implement, maintain and further the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP) Carbon Neutrality Plan Goal: Equitable Systems Strategies ES-1: Incorporate equity as a foundational element of every climate action the City develops and implements. ES-2: Proactively engage community members on an ongoing basis. Goal: Decreased Dependence on Cars Strategies: DD-1: Encourage vibrancy, appropriate density, and attainability in existing neighborhoods, so that more residents live within walking distance of their daily needs. DD-2: Create inclusive networks for walking and biking that are continuous, attractive, safe, comprehensive, and convenient for people of all ages. DD-3: Encourage Flagstaff residents and visitors to walk, bike, roll and take the bus. Goal: Electric Mobility Strategies EM-2: Welcome electric micro-mobility devices as legitimate, healthy, affordable, and low-carbon modes of transportation. Regional Plan Goal T.1. Improve mobility and access throughout the region. Policy T.1.1. Integrate a balanced, multimodal, regional transportation system. Policy T.1.2. Apply Complete Street Guidelines to accommodate all appropriate modes of travel in transportation improvement projects. Policy T.1.5. Manage the operation and interaction of all modal systems for efficiency, effectiveness, safety, and to best mitigate traffic congestion. Policy T.1.6. Provide and promote strategies that increase alternate modes of travel and demand for vehicular travel to reduce peak period traffic. Goal T.2. Improve transportation safety and efficiency for all modes. Policy T.2.1. Design infrastructure to provide safe and efficient movement of vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. Policy T.2.3. Provide safety programs and infrastructure to protect the most vulnerable travelers, including the young, elderly, mobility impaired, pedestrians, and bicyclists. Goal T.3. Provide transportation infrastructure that is conducive to conservation, preservation, and development goals to avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts on the natural and built environment. Policy T.3.2. Promote transportation systems that reduce the use of fossil fuels and eventually replace with carbon neutral alternatives. Policy T.3.4. Actively manage parking, including cost and supply, to support land use, transportation, and economic development goals. Policy T.3.8. Promote transportation options such as increased public transit and more bike lanes to reduce congestion, fuel consumption, and overall carbon emissions and promote walkable community design. Goal T.4. Promote transportation infrastructure and services that enhance the quality of life of the communities within the region. Policy T.4.1. Promote context sensitive solutions (CSS) supportive of planned land uses, integration of related infrastructure needs, and desired community character elements in all transportation investments. Policy T.4.2. Design all gateway corridors, streets, roads, and highways to safely and attractively accommodate all transportation users with contextual landscaping and appropriate architectural features. Goal T.5. Increase the availability and use of pedestrian infrastructure, including FUTS, as a critical element of a safe and livable community. Policy T.5.1. Provide accessible pedestrian infrastructure with all public and private street construction and reconstruction projects. Policy T.5.2. Improve pedestrian visibility and safety and raise awareness of the benefits of walking. Policy T.5.3. Identify specific pedestrian mobility and accessibility challenges and develop a program to build and maintain necessary improvements. Policy T.5.4. Design streets with continuous pedestrian infrastructure of sufficient width to provide safe, accessible use and opportunities for shelter. Goal T.6. Provide for bicycling as a safe and efficient means of transportation and recreation. Policy T.6.1. Expand recognition of bicycling as a legitimate and beneficial form of transportation. Policy T.6.2. Establish and maintain a comprehensive, consistent, and highly connected system of bikeways and FUTS trails. Policy T.6.3. Educate bicyclists and motorists about bicyclist safety through education programs, enforcement, and detailed crash analyses. Policy T.6.4. Encourage bikeways and bicycle infrastructure to serve the needs of a full range of bicyclist experience levels. Policy T.6.5. Provide short- and long-term bicycle parking where bicyclists want to travel. Policy T6.6. Integrate policies to increase bicycling and meet the needs of bicyclists into all relevant plans, policies, studies, strategies, and regulations. Goal T.7. Provide a high-quality, safe, convenient, accessible public transportation system, where feasible, to serve as an attractive alternative to single-occupant vehicles. Policy T.7.5. Incorporate adopted plans and policies for non-motorized and public transportation in the permitting process for all development or land use proposals, including provisions for efficient access and mobility, and convenient links between pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. Goal T.9. Strengthen and support rail service opportunities for the region’s businesses and travelers. Policy T.9.4. Increase the number of grade-separated railroad crossings. Goal T.10. Strengthen and expand the role of Flagstaff Pulliam Airport as the dominant hub for passenger, air freight, public safety flights, and other services in northern Arizona. Policy T.10.2. Improve multimodal access and service to and from the airport including transit, bicycle, and parking services. Goal T.11. Build and sustain public support for the implementation of transportation planning goals and policies, including the financial underpinnings of the Plan, by actively seeking meaningful community involvement. Policy T.11.2. Approach public involvement proactively throughout regional transportation planning, prioritization, and programming processes, including open access to communications, meetings, and documents related to the Plan. Policy T.11.3. Include and involve all segments of the population, including those potentially underrepresented such as the elderly, low-income, and minorities Policy T.11.4. Attempt to equitably distribute the burdens and benefits of transportation investments to all segments of the community. Goal NH.1. Foster and maintain healthy and diverse urban, suburban, and rural neighborhoods in the Flagstaff region. Policy NH.1.3. Interconnect existing and new neighborhoods through patterns of development, with complete streets, sidewalks, and trails. Goal OS.1. The region has a system of open lands, such as undeveloped natural areas, wildlife corridors and habitat areas, trails, access to public lands, and greenways to support the natural environment that sustains our quality of life, cultural heritage, and ecosystem health. Policy OS.1.4. Use open space as opportunities for non-motorized connectivity, to interact with nature, and to enjoy the views and quiet. Goal WR.5. Manage watersheds and stormwater to address flooding concerns, water quality, environmental protections, and rainwater harvesting. Policy WR.5.2. Incorporate pedestrian access, trails, and watchable wildlife opportunities into natural watercourses when practical. Goal E.1. Increase energy efficiency. Policy E.1.5. Promote and encourage the expansion and use of energy-efficient modes of transportation: a. Public transportation b. Bicycles c. Pedestrians Goal CC.4. Design and develop all projects to be contextually sensitive, to enhance a positive image and identity for the region. Policy CC.4.1. Design streetscapes to be context sensitive and transportation systems to reflect the desired land use while balancing the needs of all modes for traffic safety and construction and maintenance costs. Policy CC.4.4. Design streets and parking lots to balance automobile facilities, recognize human-scale and pedestrian needs, and accentuate the surrounding environment. Goal CC.5. Support and promote art, science, and education resources for all to experience. Policy CC.5.4. Complete sidewalks and Flagstaff Urban Trails System connections for all schools, community colleges, and university campuses. Goal LU.1. Invest in existing neighborhoods and activity centers for the purpose of developing complete, and connected places. Policy LU.1.4. Attract private investment by reinvesting in transportation infrastructure improvements as well as public utilities infrastructure for desired development size. Goal LU.2. Develop Flagstaff ’s Greenfields in accordance with the Regional Plan and within the growth boundary. Policy LU.2.1. Design new neighborhoods that embody the characteristics of Flagstaff’s favorite neighborhoods – that is, with a mix of uses, a variety of housing types and densities, public spaces, and greater connectivity with multimodal transportation options. Goal LU.10. Increase the proportion of urban neighborhoods to achieve walkable, compact growth. Policy LU.10.1. Prioritize connectivity within all urban neighborhoods and activity centers. Policy LU.10.2. Support on-street parking, shared lots, and parking structures. Policy LU.10.7. Invest in infrastructure and right-of-way enhancements that favor the pedestrian and transit as an incentive for private investment in urban neighborhoods and activity centers. Goal LU.12. Accommodate pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and private cars to supplement downtown’s status as the best-served and most accessible location in the region. Policy LU.12.1. Invest in downtown’s streets and sidewalks so that they remain Flagstaff’s premiere public spaces. Policy LU.12.7. Provide multiple routes and pathways for vehicular and pedestrian movement. Policy LU.12.8. Provide for strong connections from the Flagstaff Medical Campus to the Northern Arizona University campus via pedestrian paths, bicycle connections, streets, and transit service. Policy LU.12.9. As defined in the FUTS Master Plan, include trail access points, bicycle parking, and bicycle facilities. Goal LU.13. Increase the variety of housing options and expand opportunities for employment and neighborhood shopping within all suburban neighborhoods. Policy LU.13.1. Prioritize connectivity for walking, biking, and driving within and between surrounding neighborhoods. Policy LU.13.9. Use open space and FUTS trails to provide walking and biking links from residential uses to employment, shopping, schools, parks, and neighborwoods. Goal LU.14. Maintain the character of existing rural communities. Policy LU.14.4. Connect rural neighborhoods using roads, trails (equestrian, foot, and bicycle), and public access to the National Forest. Goal LU.15. Plan for and encourage employee-intensive uses throughout the area as activity centers, corridors, research and development offices, business parks, and light industrial areas to encourage efficient infrastructure and multimodal commuting. Policy LU.15.4. Accommodate safe and convenient walking, biking, and transit facilities in existing and proposed employment centers. Goal LU.19. Develop a manageable evolution of the main corridors into contextual place makers. Policy LU.19.4. Balance automobile use, parking, bicycle access, while prioritizing pedestrian safety along all corridors. |
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
No | |||||
Options and Alternatives: | |||||
Option A. Adopt Resolution 2022-50 as submitted and adopt the Active Transportation Master Plan Option B. Adopt Resolution 2022-50 with changes Option C. Do not adopt Resolution 2022-50 |
|||||
Background/History: | |||||
The ATMP is intended to serve as a guide to making walking and biking in Flagstaff more convenient, useful, comfortable, attractive, and safe. The Flagstaff Regional Plan describes an overall vision for transportation and lists a variety of goals of policies to achieve the vision, including a number of goals and policies directly related to walking and biking. The ATMP will provide the details to advance the overall vision and implement the goals and policies. | |||||
Key Considerations: | |||||
The intent of the ATMP
1 Introduction: describes the policy context, how the plan was developed, and how it will be used; closed with a list of guiding principles and a description of an overall approach. 2 Current conditions: provides an accounting of the current status of walking and biking, based on existing facilities, mode share, crash data, and national indicators. 3 Goals and policies: includes specific goals for walking and biking, as well as 32 policies organized around six topics. Appendix A supplements this chapter with a list of potential strategies and actions for each of the 32 policies. 4 Outcomes, indicators, and targets: lists desired results and measures, and establishes attainable targets for the short and long term. 5 Implementation: describes a broad range of opportunities to implement the plan, including priority actions for the first year and first five years. 6 Planning considerations: a discussion of how walking and biking fit into the larger contexts of transportation and land use planning. 7 Design guidance: provides information on design considerations for pedestrian and bicycle facilities, as well as streets and intersections. 8 Infrastructure recommendations: How the plan is used
Guiding principles
Recommended approach
|
|||||
Community Benefits and Considerations: | |||||
Walking and biking support a variety of community benefits, both directly and indirectly:
|
|||||
Community Involvement: | |||||
The community was engaged in the preparation of this draft plan in a number of ways: Community surveys: a total of 15 community surveys related to walking and biking have been conducted since 2016. Six of these were done specifically in support of the ATMP, and another nine were conducted for other projects but are relevant to walking and biking. Public outreach: staff have conversed with hundreds of residents about pedestrian and bicycle issues at numerous community events, including Earth Day, Bike-to-Work Week, Arizona Trail Day, and the Flagstaff Community Market. Two walking and biking summits were hosted in late 2017, during which approximately 100 attendees were given an opportunity to provide feedback and complete a survey. PAC and BAC meetings: since 2014, discussion of the ATMP has been a standing item on the monthly agendas of the City’s Pedestrian Advisory Committee (PAC) and Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC). The draft ATMP has also been discussed at the several Transportation Commission meetings. Other boards and commission: the draft ATMP was presented to a variety of City commission over the past year, including the Beautification and Public Art Commission, Commission on Diversity Awareness, Commission on Inclusion and Adaptive Living, Housing Commission, Open Spaces Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission, Sustainability Commission, and Tourism Commission. |
|||||
Attachments: | Res. 2022-50 | ||
Ex. A. - Draft Active Transportation Master Plan | |||
Presentation |
12.D.
| |||||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Adoption of Resolution No. 2022-52: A Resolution of the Flagstaff City Council, requiring that new construction and major renovation of all city-owned, non-housing section, occupied facilities achieve emissions-neutral operations, and that these same facilities shall be designed to support one or more functions of a “community resilience hub” to support vulnerable community members during disruptive events, and that in the event that a city-owned building or property is being vacated by the city, that the housing section first have the opportunity to evaluate the property and determine the feasibility of re-purposing or developing in a manner that supports increasing the number of available and affordable housing units, and repealing Resolution no. 2014-09. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
1) Read Resolution No. 2022-52 by title only
2) City Clerk reads Resolution No. 2022-52 by title only (if approved above) 3) Adopt Resolution No. 2022-52 |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The Sustainable Building Resolution (SBR) was first adopted in 2008 and updated in 2014. Since 2008, the SBR has outlined the organizational standards that the City of Flagstaff will follow when commissioning the construction of a new occupied building or undertaking major renovations of an existing occupied building. The 2022 revision of the SBR proposes three key updates (enumerated below). These updates will bring the Sustainable Buildings Resolution into greater alignment with the City Council and community priorities of mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, increasing community resilience, and increasing the number of available and affordable housing units. These priorities are reflected in the recent adoption of the Climate Emergency Declaration (Res 2020-09) the Housing Crisis Declaration (Res. No 2020-66) the Flagstaff Carbon Neutrality Plan (Res 2021-34) the 10 Year Housing Plan (Res. No 2022-03) and the Sustainable Building Incentive (PZ-21-00282). The development of the 2022 SBR revisions was undertaken by an inter-division team of City staff, including the Housing Section, the Real Estate Manager, the Community Development Division Director, the Facilities Section, and the Sustainability Office. The proposed revisions to the Sustainable Building Resolution incorporate the following key concepts:
Based on comments from Council during the 10/18/2022 Council Meeting, the following additions/deletions were made: WHEREAS,
ENACTMENTS: No changes made since 10/18/2022 Council Meeting. Staff will provide a short presentation of the recommended revisions to the Resolution and the updates that have been made based on Council feedback. |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
Designing and constructing sustainable buildings has been shown to have only a minor impact on total building costs, particularly when incorporated early in the building design process. Many sustainability features can bring potential cost savings, such as energy efficiency, and building electrification. According to a major survey of the building community in Massachusetts, “net zero ready buildings are being built at the same cost as conventional buildings. 87% of net zero ready buildings reported have less than a 1% construction cost premium. This is consistent across all building types and sizes, including high-rise buildings that are hundreds of thousands of square feet.” (Source: Built Environment Plus: Massachusetts is Ready for Net Zero (2021)). (Massachusetts is in Climate Zone 5 Moist; Flagstaff is in Climate Zone 5, Dry.) |
|||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
This will update and replace the policy of Res 2014-09. | |||||
Connection to PBB Priorities/Objectives, Carbon Neutrality Plan & Regional Plan: | |||||
Regional Plan:
|
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
Yes. The Sustainable Building Resolution was first adopted in 2008 and revised in 2014. These revisions align the Sustainable Building Resolution with the goals and urgency of:
|
|||||
Attachments: | Redline of 2014 SBR | ||
Res. 2022-52 | |||
2022 SBR PPT |
12.E.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE: | |||||
Consideration and Adoption of Ordinance No. 2022-29: An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Flagstaff, amending section 1-07-001-0005, Salaries, of the Flagstaff City Code, and establishing an effective date. | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
At the November 1, 2022 Council Meeting:
1) Read Ordinance No. 2022-29 by title only for the first time 2) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-29 by title only (if approved above) At the November 15, 2022 Council Meeting: 3) Read Ordinance No. 2022-29 by title only for the final time 4) City Clerk reads Ordinance No. 2022-29 by title only (if approved above) 5) Adopt Ordinance No. 2022-29 |
|||||
Executive Summary: | |||||
The City Code 1-07-001-0005 Salaries outlines the salary and benefits for Mayor and Council members along with the process for a review of these salaries. There was a request from the majority of City Council following the adoption of 2019-39 in February 2020 to review the salaries of Mayor and Council. The City Council appointed four members to the Citizen Commission on Council Salaries during their April 19. 2022 meeting and the five commission members from Planning and Zoning, Parks and Recreation, Tourism, Water, and Transportation Commissions were identified between June and August 2022. The newly created Citizen Commission on Council Salaries met in September and October of 2022 to consider information such as examples of work, municipal and county benchmark data, consumer price index, minimum wage, cost of living, and living wages as they crafted their recommendation. The City's website includes a webpage dedicated to the Citizen's Commission that includes the agendas, minutes and a form for members of the public to provide feedback. A press release was sent out on October 3, 2022 to encourage the public to share their feedback either online using the form on the website or to attend the October 12, 2022 meeting. The Commission members finalized their recommendation during the October 12, 2022 meeting to include an increase in the Mayor's salary from $38,500 to $54,340 and Council's salary from $25,500 to $44,650 following the 2022 election. Then effective December 1, 2024 an increase in the Mayor's salary from $54,340 to $70,180 and Council's salary from $44,650 to $63,800. The recommendation also includes a change to the monthly routine travel and meals stipend for the Mayor from $150 to $200 with a City vehicle and $250 to $300 without a City vehicle and for Council member from $166 to $200 per month. These recommendations recognize the irregular schedule of Council members and the difficulty to fit their responsibilities within a normal work schedule and compensates them appropriately for the time being spent fulfilling their duties and meeting community expectations. It also recognizes the role, responsibility, and impact of City Council member decisions. The recommended salary provides a sustainable wage that has the ability to attract quality and diverse candidates to fill Council vacancies. This aligns Council salaries closer to County Board of Supervisors and like community salaries while continuing the differential between Mayor and Council salaries. |
|||||
Financial Impact: | |||||
The impact to salaries and the monthly routine travel and meals stipend will be accounted for in the annual budget process. | |||||
Policy Impact: | |||||
There are no other policy impacts. | |||||
Connection to PBB Priorities/Objectives, Carbon Neutrality Plan & Regional Plan: | |||||
Priority Based Budget Key Community Priorities and Objectives
These recommendations support Mayor and Council members and the City Councils works to meet all of the community priorities and objectives in effective governance, safe & healthy community, inclusive & engaged community, sustainable, innovative infrastructure, robust resilient economy, livable community and environmental stewardship.
|
|||||
Has There Been Previous Council Decision on This: | |||||
No. | |||||
Attachments: | Ord. 2022-29 | ||
Presentation |
13.A.
| |||||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE | |||||
Snow Readiness and Operations Update- PROSE / Public Works | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Discussion of the upcoming winter season preparations and parking restrictions. This discussion item is informational only.
- Public Works Streets Section snow operations
- Parks Section snow operations - Parking and community impacts |
|||||
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: | |||||
The City of Flagstaff historically receives approximately 100" of snow during 15-25 weather events in a typical winter season. In the late fall, preparations of equipment and training of personnel begins for winter snow operations. The community has high expectations of transportation network and facilities clearing. The snow operations discussion will provide insights into the operations of Public Works and Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Events (PROSE) Divisions, and is educational for all residents and visitors of Flagstaff. | |||||
INFORMATION: | |||||
Attached Power Point Presentation | |||||
Attachments: | PROSE/STREETS Snow Readiness PowerPoint |
13.B.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE | |||||
Discussion on Stormwater Credit Manual Revisions | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Staff recommends accepting the proposed revisions to the Stormwater Credit Manual and seeks direction from City Council to formalize those revisions.
|
|||||
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: | |||||
The most recent Stormwater Credit Manual was instituted in 2015. No amendments been made since. A detailed review of the Stormwater Credit Manual reveals potential inconsistencies with the original intent of the manual. Concerns exist about the current Stormwater Credit Manual's provision of incentives to Flagstaff residents. The intent of this discussion item is to provide Council with the ability to review Staff recommended revisions to the Credit Manual. If approved, Staff will move forward with an ordinance to create an updated Stormwater Credit Manual for 2023 and the future. Such an ordinance would require the standard two public readings at subsequent City Council Meetings. |
|||||
INFORMATION: | |||||
The most recent Stormwater Credit Manual went into effect in 2015. It is a revised version of the original Stormwater Credit Manual of 2006 and was intended to provide incentives to businesses and property owners to "go above and beyond" in their private stormwater infrastructure. The current Stormwater Credit Manual contains language that could pose possible concerns with its application. The subject of revising the Stormwater Credit Manual was briefly mentioned to Council as part of the initial City Council discussions related to the Stormwater Rate Study. Additionally, this item was formally presented to the Water Commission in September. A summary of the proposed changes are below and are also in the attached draft updated Stormwater Credit Manual. If the draft document is accepted by Council it will be put forward in ordinance form with the required two public reads at future regular City Council Meetings. Stormwater Detention: In particular: the current Stormwater Credit Manual provides a 20% credit for detention of the 2, 10 and 100 year events. This must be clarified as these standards are required by current code. The Stormwater Credit Manual provides a 9% credit for meeting detention code of the 1990s. This must be clarified to be consistent with the current detention requirements of the updated/current drainage code. Staff recommends removing both credits and replacing with a 10% credit for detention basins that provide detention beyond current code. Specifically a detention requirement for a 500 year event. Residential Water Harvesting: The Stormwater Credit Manual currently provides a 10% credit for a minimum of 2 rain barrels with a combined capacity of 100 gallons on a residential property. Staff recommends this be changed to a minimum of 300 gallons of on-site residential rainwater harvesting. This change is intended to show a real benefit in terms of rainwater runoff reduction while not being too difficult to obtain for a typical property owner. Conservation Easement: The Stormwater Credit Manual provides a 10% credit for a minimum of 10 contiguous acres of conservation easement. This requirement will be hard to meet within City limits as open parcels become more rare, and more expensive. It is recommended that this be changed to 2 contiguous acres of conservation easement for the 10% credit. Structured Educational Program: No change. Additional change to the Credit Manual: Addition of a section for floodproofing, provide a 10% credit for "wet" or "dry" floodproofing of the primary structure(s) on a parcel. |
|||||
Attachments: | Draft Credit Manual | ||
Existing Credit Manual | |||
Presentation |
13.C.
| |||||||||||
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF | |||||||||||
STAFF SUMMARY REPORT | |||||||||||
|
![]() |
TITLE | |||||
Discussion of potential Holiday Display Policy | |||||
STAFF RECOMMENDED ACTION: | |||||
Discussion and direction to staff regarding potential establishment by resolution of a holiday display policy.
|
|||||
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: | |||||
City Council has received legal advice in executive session regarding potential options for the establishment of a holiday display policy by adoption of a resolution. City Council now has the opportunity to discuss options and give direction for the potential establishment of a holiday display policy by adoption of a resolution. | |||||
INFORMATION: | |||||
After City Council discussed the potential establishment of a holiday display policy, staff will await direction from Council before drafting a resolution for consideration and potential adoption at the November 15, 2022 Regular City Council Meeting to become effective immediately upon adoption. | |||||
Attachments: |