| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
|
Call to Order
Chair Emily Dale called the meeting to order at 5:02 PM.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
|
Roll Call
| NOTE: One or more Commission Members may be in attendance telephonically or by other technological means. |
PRESENT:
EMILY DALE, Chair
SHELLI DEA, Vice-Chair
ABBEY BUCKHAM
BERNADETTE BURCHAM
DUFFIE WESTHEIMER
ABSENT-EXCUSED:
ALYCIA HAYES
CAITLIN KELLY |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
|
LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The Heritage Preservation Commission humbly acknowledges the ancestral homelands of this area’s Indigenous nations and original stewards. These lands, still inhabited by Native descendants, border mountains sacred to Indigenous peoples. We honor them, their legacies, their traditions, and their continued contributions. We celebrate their past, present, and future generations who will forever know this place as home.
Abbey Buckham read the land acknowledgement. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
|
Public Comment
At this time, any member of the public may address the Commission on any subject within their jurisdiction that is not scheduled before the Commission on that day. Due to Open Meeting Laws, the Commission cannot discuss or act on items presented during this portion of the agenda. To address the Commission on an item that is on the agenda, please wait for the Chair to call for Public Comment at the time the item is heard.
No public comment |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
|
|
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approve the Minutes of the March 15, 2023 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting. |
| |
Duffie Westheimer: Noted two edits to the March 15, 2023 minutes.
1) On item one, the Yogurt Shop, correct Duffie Westheimer’s comment to clarify that she believes the cornice, which is being painted a bright color, is larger than a typical accent and is therefore, too bright.
2) On item 7, B, 1 - Downtown Historic Transportation Corridor - edit Duffie Westheimer's comment to read: Also asked, "can Mark do anything about adjusting schedules during construction so people who live downtown can still function?" Emphasizing that there are many projects that could take place in the same area (downtown) at the same time. They should be coordinated so that downtown and surrounding neighborhoods can function.
|
| |
Moved by Abbey Buckham, seconded by Shelli Dea to approve the minutes of the March 15 Heritage Preservation Commission meeting with the edits as noted by Commissioner Westheimer.
|
| |
Vote: 5 - 0 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
|
|
|
PUBLIC HEARING
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. |
|
|
Marlar Home (12 Hillside St) Cultural Resource Study
Address: 12 N Hillside St
Assessor's Parcel Number: 101-11-002
Property Owner: Jim & Helene Babbitt Revocable Trust
Applicant: Karl Eberhard
City Staff: Mark Reavis, Heritage Preservation Officer
Accept the Phase 2 Cultural Resource Study and supplemental photos, architectural drawings for compliance with Heritage Preservation 10-30.30 for the removal of a home from the North End Residential District, listed in the National Register of Historic Places.
Approve the submitted Cultural Resource Phase-2 Study meeting submission requirements of Historic research and property recordation called out in 10-30.30 and specific to 10-30.30.050
- The Commission could approve the Phase 2 Cultural Resource Study -or-
- The Commission could approve with condition the submitted Phase 2 Cultural Resource Study with additional mitigation -or-
- The Commission could request in addition to the Staff recommendations additional modifications and requirements to the Cultural Resource Study and include them as conditions of approval – or –
- Deny and request resubmittal.
None
|
| |
Commissioner Westheimer recused herself from agenda items 6A, 6B, and 6C.
Mark Reavis: Gave a brief introduction to the project and introduced Karl Eberhard, the applicant who prepared the cultural resource study.
Karl Eberhard: Provided some additional background and information about the project and the plan to relocate the building.
Abbey Buckham: Asked whether the building is being demolished or whether that will only happen if the building move does not happen.
Karl Eberhard: Clarified that the plan is to move the building to 615 W Birch, but that he is unsure what the owners will do if the move falls through.
Shelli Dea: Asked what necessitates the existing building being moved.
Karl Eberhard: Explained that the owners would like to build a new house on the land and want the existing building gone.
Mark Reavis: Added that the phase 2 cultural resource study fully documents the structure in the same way as similar properties where a full demolition has been allowed.
Emily Dale: Asked whether the hope is to use the existing building as housing after it is moved.
Karl Eberhard: Answered that yes, the plan is to use the building for housing.
Sara Dechter: Clarified that this agenda item is just voting on whether or not to accept the cultural resource study. |
| |
Moved by Shelli Dea, seconded by Bernadette Burcham to approve the submitted Cultural Resource Phase-2 Study meeting submission requirements of Historic research and property recordation called out in 10-30.30 and specific to 10-30.30.050.
|
| |
Vote: 4 - 0 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. |
|
|
615 W Birch - Relocated Home Placement
Address: 615 W Birch Ave
Assessor's Parcel Number: 100-16-007
Property Owner: Townsite Community Land Trust (TCLT) c.o. Duffie Westheimer, Executive Director
Applicant: Karl Eberhard
City Staff: Mark Reavis, Heritage Preservation Officer
The applicant has requested a Certificate of Appropriateness for a moved home to be placed on an open lot located at 615 W Birch.
Staff recommends approval of a “Certificate of Appropriateness” for the placement of a home currently located at 12 N Hillside to a land parcel located at 615 W Birch Ave within the Townsite Design Review Overlay District.
The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) for “Certificate of Appropriateness may:
(1) Approve per the staff recommended motion – or –
(2) The Commission could request modifications to the proposal and include them as conditions of approval – or –
(3) Continue the HPC review to a date certain and ask the applicant to come back with a modified proposal that meets those conditions – or -
(4) Deny Certificate of Appropriateness and require Certificate of Economic Hardship or submittal of an alternative design that meets all Townsite Overlay Requirements.
None
|
| |
Mark Reavis: Provided a brief overview of the project, and explained that the review treats the home as a new construction project in the townsite overlay.
Karl Eberhard: Added additional information about the architectural elements of the home and compatibility with the Townsite design review standards.
Mark Reavis: Noted that the site for the building is currently open, having been used as a garden most recently.
Abbey Buckham: Asked what the new owner intends to do with the house.
Karl Eberhard: Explained that the new owner will be the Townsite Community Land Trust and provided some additional information as to how the land trust's ownership model works.
Emily Dale: Asked whether the Land Trust already owns the property.
Karl Eberhard: Stated that the Land Trust does already own the property.
Emily Dale: Asked whether the project will create a more cramped space in the Townsite district?
Mark Reavis: Explained that the building is actually being placed on an empty lot.
Emily Dale: Asked whether the project has been brought forward to neighbors in the area and whether they had had time to comment.
Sara Dechter: Confirmed that there was a posting and shared images of the posting notice.
Karl Eberhard: Also noted that the property owners spoke to the immediate neighbors on both sides and that what is being brought to the commission was the preferred course of action by all parties.
Burnadette Burcham: Asked if the posting was in a visible area.
Mark Reavis: Clarified that, yes, it was in a visible area.
Shelli Dea: Asked what the success rate of moving a building like this is.
Karl Eberhard: Answered that the success rate is very high.
Burnadette Burcham: Stated that this project is a really positive one for the community.
Shelli Dea: Expressed agreement and hoped this could serve as a model for other similar projects.
Mark Reavis: Noted that there is a possibility of having the property listed as part of the Townsite Historic District. |
| |
Moved by Shelli Dea, seconded by Bernadette Burcham to approve a “Certificate of Appropriateness” for the placement of a home currently located at 12 N Hillside to a land parcel located at 615 W Birch Ave within the Townsite Design Review Overlay District.
|
| |
Vote: 4 - 0 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. |
|
|
Facade Grant Request Townsite Community Land Trust for 615 W Birch
Address: 615 W Birch Ave
Assessor's Parcel Number:
Property Owner: Townsite Community Land Trust
Applicant: Karl Eberhard
City Staff: Mark Reavis, Heritage Preservation Officer
Approve a $10,000 matching Facade Grant
Recommended Motion: Approve a grant allocation of $10,000 for 615 W Birch Ave for rehabilitation work on the home moved from 12 S Hillside with the condition that:
- the rehabilitation work meets the US Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, and
- excluding the new foundation and addition from reimbursement.
The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) for the Historic Façade and Signs Grant may:
- Approve the application as written – or –
- Approve per the staff-recommended motion – or –
- The Commission could request modifications to the proposal and include them as conditions of approval – or –
- Continue the HPC review to a date certain and ask the applicant to come back with a modified proposal that meets those conditions – or -
- Deny the grant request.
HPC will first review Certificate of Appropriateness prior to consideration of a grant request
|
| |
Mark Reavis: Introduced the project and clarified what the grant money would be used for – up to $10,000 matching for the small house to be placed on the property with historic rehab of the house. Noted that the foundation and home addition are not included.
Emily Dale: Noted that there is $5,000 in the application funding breakdown for the foundation and asked if that was incorrect.
Mark Reavis: Clarified that the attached funding breakdown is incorrect and that an updated one was sent out to the commission.
Karl Eberhard: Read out the updated estimate and line items - noted below.
- Excavating and grading at $11,000.
- Concrete and masonry at $23,900.
- Utilities at $14,500.
- Plumbing at $12,000.
- electrical at $9,500.
- Rough carpentry at $38,000.
- Insulation at $9,750.
- HVAC at $6,000.
- drywall at $8,000.
- painting at $13,000.
- roofing at $9,500.
- Windows and doors at $12,150.
- Cabinets and countertops is $7,500.
- Finish carpentry at $10,500.
- Boring at $8,000.
- Tile at $5,500.
- Overhead and profit at $61,500 - slightly less.
Total cost of $307,312.50
Mark Reavis: Clarified that the grant is only for the small exterior components of the house, such as trim, painting, anchorage, and rehab and repairs. |
| |
Moved by Shelli Dea, seconded by Bernadette Burcham to approve a grant allocation of $10,000 for 615 W Birch Ave for rehabilitation work on the home moved from 12 S Hillside with the condition that:
- that the grant is for facade work.
- the rehabilitation work meets the US Secretary of the Interior’s Standards,
- excluding the new foundation and addition from reimbursement.
|
| |
Vote: 4 - 0 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. |
|
|
Certificate of Appropriateness - 314 N. Mogollon
Address: 314 N Mogollon Street
Assessor's Parcel Number: 100-07-009
Property Owner: Jeff & Karen Kramarczyk
Applicant: Updesign Studio, Anne Mead Architect
City Staff: Mark Reavis, Heritage Preservation Officer
The project architect has requested a Certificate of Appropriateness for the rehabilitation of a home and the construction of a new Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) per the application and submitted documentation.
Approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the Rehabilitation for a primary existing home's rehabilitation and the construction of a detached Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) with the demolition of 2 garages at a property located at 314 N Mogollon Street.
OPTIONS FOR COMMISSION DECISION-MAKING:
The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) for “Certificate of Appropriateness may:
(1) Approve per the staff recommended motion – or –
(2) The Commission could request modifications to the proposal and include them as conditions of approval – or –
(3) Continue the HPC review to a date certain and ask the applicant to come back with a modified proposal that meets those conditions – or -
(4) Deny Certificate of Appropriateness and require Certificate of Economic Hardship or submittal of an alternative design that meets all Townsite Overlay Requirements.
none
|
| |
Commissioner Shelli Dea left the meeting at 5:39 PM
Commissioner Duffie Westheimer returned to the meeting at 5:39 PM |
| |
Mark Reavis: Introduced the project and applicant.
Anne Mead (Architect for the project): Provided an overview of the proposed project, including siting and architectural components of the accessory dwelling unit being constructed, and work on the existing home.
Jeff Kramarczyk (Applicant): Noted that the removal of the garage would allow the existing chimney on the home to be visible.
Anne Mead: Noted that she and the applicant had met with Mark Reavis to ensure that the ADU design met the Townsite requirements.
Emily Dale: Asked if the existing garage is in the back of the property.
Mark Reavis: Confirmed that the garage was in the back.
Sara Dechter: Shared the renderings and photos of the existing property and proposed ADU.
Duffie Westheimer: Expressed appreciation for the attention paid to the Townsite overlay. Asked how far out the porch will come.
Anne Mead: Clarified that the new porch will come out 8 ft, while the old one came out 6 ft.
Duffie Westheimer: Asked whether the project will require the removal of the two flowering trees in the front of the property.
Jeff Kramarczyk: Stated that, no, neither tree will be removed.
Duffie Westheimer: Asked whether any flooding occurred where the accessory dwelling unit is being constructed.
Anne Meade: Stated that she was not aware of any significant flooding and that the site had good drainage. |
| |
Moved by Bernadette Burcham, seconded by Duffie Westheimer to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the Rehabilitation for a primary existing home's rehabilitation and the construction of a detached Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) with the demolition of 2 garages at a property located at 314 N Mogollon Street.
|
| |
Vote: 4 - 0 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. |
|
|
314 Mogollon Facade Grant
Address: 314 N Mogollon
Assessor's Parcel Number: 100-07-009
Property Owner: Jeff & Karen Kramarczyk
Applicant: Updesign Studio, Anne Mead Architect
City Staff: Mark Reavis, Heritage Preservation Officer
The architect on behalf of the property owners of 315 N Mogollon has requested a $10,000 Historic Facade Grant for work associated with the rehabilitation of an older home within the Townsite Design Review Overlay.
Approve a grant allocation of $10,000 to be awarded for rehabilitation work on an existing home as described in the application.
The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) for the Historic Façade and Signs Grant may:
(1) Approve per the staff recommended motion – or –
(2) The Commission could request modifications to the proposal and include them as conditions of approval – or –
(3) Continue the HPC review to a date certain and ask the applicant to come back with a modified proposal that meets those conditions – or -
(4) Deny the grant request.
A Certificate of Appropriateness is to be reviewed prior to this request.
|
| |
Mark Reavis: Introduced the project and the items that will be considered for the grant.
Duffie Westheimer: Noted that many homes in the neighborhood have the same type of asbestos siding that is being removed from the house and that
if the applicant can remove it without destroying it, it'd be a great resource for other people in the neighborhood. |
| |
Moved by Duffie Westheimer, seconded by Abbey Buckham to approve the facade grant request of $10,000 for 314 N Mogollon St, for new siding, windows, and trim.
|
| |
Vote: 4 - 0 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
|
|
|
REPORTS |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. |
|
|
APPROVALS |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
Peace Surplus Sign Modification
Permit Number(s): PZ-23-00053 & cc-23-00511
Address: Address: 14 W Route 66
Assessor's Parcel Number: 100-200-21A
Property Owner: Lolas Kids LLC -- Lease - Erin Ahmed
Applicant: Jeff Wells - Sign Co rep City Staff: MR HPO
Type of Approval: Certificate of No Effect
Approval Date: 4/10/2023
|
| |
Mark Reavis: Went over the sign change. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. |
|
|
CONSULTATIONS |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
Consultation - 11 E Aspen, BP-23-00277
Reviewed that work was isolated to interior repairs with no exterior effect.
|
| |
Mark Reavis: Clarified that the project is only interior work. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
|
|
|
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO/FROM COMMISSION MEMBERS
- New Commissioner and Thank you lunch for outgoing Commissioner Horn
Sara Dechter: Asked commissioners to rsvp for the thank you lunch and noted that one new commissioner has been appointed.
- Next Meeting May 17, 2023 at 3pm in the Council Chambers
Sara Dechter: Clarified that the meeting is at 4PM, but that Emily Dale and Shelli Dea will need technology training before the meeting.
- Staff recommended General Business for May 2023.
Sara Dechter: Staff will be bringing several items to the commission next meeting:
1) The new applications.
2) The final version of the new grant application guidelines.
Mark Reavis: Noted that Commissioner Buckham was not aware of the Townsite Community Land Trust.
Duffie Westheimer: Stated she would be happy to provide more information.
Duffie Westheimer: Asked for an update on the WC Riles project.
Sara Dechter: Stated that staff could bring an update to that during the next meeting.
- New applications for Commission and HPO reviews.
Emily Dale: Stated that she would not be here for the June commission meeting. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
|
|
|
ADJOURNMENT |
| |
Chair Emily Dale adjourned the meeting at 6:12PM |